After many discussions, complaints and protests on the issue of abortion, our beloved church and apostolic coitólica returns to delight us with their medieval ideas. This time, removed from the pig's mouth, I mean, Archbishop of Granada. My compliments to the suckling pig. The words uttered by this aberration can be read on the following link:
Homily of Archbishop of Granada
suggest that the reading is made close to a toilet where vomit taste. Take a deep breath, be patient, because the text is long and tedious, and, if possible, prepare a linden and chamomile to rest the mind and stomach.
For those who do not want or dare not, for whatever reason, read the homily in full, we summarize the salient points of the text, which has spawned a wave of protests against this man "?. Here goes:
1. Enactment a law which puts thousands of professionals (doctors, nurses, ...)-they-especially in situations similar to those that had to confront the doctors or soldiers under the regime of Hitler or Stalin, or any of the dictatorships that existed in the twentieth century that really established the legality of other crimes, less repugnant than that of abortion.
If a doctor or nurse has a moral convictions so strong as to be unable to perform an abortion, you can choose from any of the specialties that do not touch this issue, as could be cardiology, nephrology, digestive, etc. We can say that because in English the masculine plural is used as plural generic, except for cases like having a class of 20 students and 2 students, nurses should say and not nurses.
2. There in the Middle Ages Middle Ages in that precious that nobody wants to remember because it's not politically correct Christian military order in which the knights did not fight the oath of never less than two enemies at once, because for a Christian gentleman was unworthy to fight on equal terms with who was not Christian. The world may call it stupidity. I call value.
I do not know where to get this man the idea that remembering the Middle Ages is not politically correct. Even more surprising I think the fact qualify as "beautiful." Of course, we speak of a senior official of the Church. It is normal that yearns for better times, for them, where nobody who was questioned and was reduced to ashes.
These statements are still longing to those shown below:
3. But to kill a defenseless child, and to do his own mother! That gives men the discharge, without limitation, of abusing the woman's body, because the tragedy she swallows, and swallows it like a law: the right to live life sorry for a crime always leaves traces in the conscience and which neither doctors nor psychiatrists and all technical know the remedy.
This could be, in fact, is the culminating point of the homily, it is, obviously, an apology for violence. It is a spit, a whipping, not only against my sex and my person, but against everyone: me, us, we reduce the scum of an object and them, to the extent of irrational animals.
response, rejection of society to these statements was immediate and has materialized in the form of Facebook group. This might seem at first no more than a group tantrum, however, from his blog, Stephen Mucientes reminds us that something similar happened with certain statements of Cospedal and finally, clamant voice made itself heard. Let this voice also is heard and the Archbishop of Granada pig soon appear before the courts.
More information, and because it seems that this man is chronic and / or collects, here:
Javier Martínez Fernández, Archbishop of Granada: "If a woman aborts, the boy may abuse it"
Resistance against Archbishop license to abuse women
"Let justice take action against the Archbishop of Granada"
A veteran Archbishop lawsuits
The Archbishop of Granada, condescending to the alleged pedophile and lethal with the solidarity
The Archbishop of Granada expelled two young aspiring nun being foreigners
Controversy over call to civil disobedience against the EpC
0 comments:
Post a Comment